Movie Ratings, Family Movie Reviews & More!

Dinner For Schmucks


Latest Home Video

Jan 04, 2011

MPAA Rating:


Run Time:



Jay Roach


Steve Carell

Paul Rudd

Stephanie Szostak


2010 Paramount Pictures

Official Website >>

Still shot from the movie: Dinner For Schmucks.

Read Review

Reviewed by

Overall C-
Run Time114

Making the Grades

Tim (Paul Rudd) is bucking for a promotion at his asset management firm. Recognized for his ability to schmooze a wealthy new client into the corporate portfolio, he has a shot at moving up to the coveted 7th Floor if he is willing to play a strange game: Search for a schmuck and invite him to his boss’s (Bruce Greenwood) monthly "dinner for idiots." Whoever shows up with the biggest bozo wins the prize. For Tim, that means the big promotion.

Unlike the other executives where he works, Tim’s live-in girlfriend Julie (Stephanie Szostak) immediately recognizes the cruel intent of the activity. However her sharp criticism doesn’t deter the determined manager, especially after he meets Barry (Steve Carell), an IRS employee who lands on the hood of Tim’s Porsche while he is busy texting.

After recovering from the forced acquainting, the nerdy looking victim reveals his life’s passion of collecting and arranging dead mice in detailed dioramas. When he whips out a scene of The Last Supper, with Jesus and the apostles all being represented by taxidermically prepared rodents, Tim feels he has found the perfect dinner guest. Extending the invitation, Barry readily accepts—and even shows up a day early.

Barry arrives in the midst of a spat between the couple, and immediately integrates himself into Tim’s life. He creates complete chaos by inadvertently allowing a woman (Lucy Punch) into Tim’s home who has been stalking the corporate climber for three years. By the end of the night, Tim’s apartment is nearly destroyed, his Porsche is beaten and he’s facing a tax audit.

There are moments of genius in this script that are made truly funny by Steve Carell’s very capable performance. But sadly, the movie stoops to the lowest common denominator shared by far too many contemporary comedies to create laughs. Sexual jokes, innuendo and outright explicit discussions permeate many scenes. Partial female and male nudity, with explicit body parts barely covered, is briefly shown. Offensive language (such as profanities, a single sexual expletive and many terms of deity) is heard throughout. And the constant slapstick violence includes the dismemberment of a finger during a fight.

Content aside, the theme itself may present the greatest issue for parents. Reported to be far less cruel than the popular French film, The Dinner Game, upon which Schmucks is based, this production still begs the question: How do we perceive those around us who appear "different?" Thankfully, the final few minutes do attempt to reorient the audience perspective to view the rich executives as the nasty members of the club while the "idiots" claim their right to social acceptance. Yet it’s a weak excuse to justify laughing at marginalized members of society for the last two hours—or to alleviate the lingering guilt we may feel after chuckling at their expense.

Discussion Ideas After The Movie

Teaching ideas and topics to discuss about Dinner For Schmucks.

Who determines the status of people in society? In this movie, what are some of the common features of characters that are presented as successful versus those who are seen as “schmucks”?

How can we tell when we are laughing with, instead of laughing at someone?

Trailers & Clips

Canadian Movie Ratings

PG Violence, Coarse and Sexual Language.
AB 14A
MB 14A Mature Theme.
ON 14A Sexual Content.

Canadian Home Video Rating: 14A

Watch @ Home

Details on home video releases of Dinner For Schmucks...

Dinner for Schmucks releases to DVD and Blu-ray on January 4, 2011. Bonus features include:

- The Biggest Schmucks in the World Schmuck Ups (Deleted Scenes)

Add Your Comments

Commenting is restricted to members only.
Please log in below or, if you're not yet a member, please register.

Forgot password? | register

Please note: So we can maintain a website with content appropriate for all ages, we moderate all comments and will edit profanities, slanderous remarks and other inappropriate language. For these reasons, your comments will not appear immediately.

barrysieg says: Aug. 01, 2010

this movie is an” F ” in my opinion. NOT FOR CHILDREN or YOUNG TEENS. how could parent previews give it a C-?
the content is simply talking about or enacting stupid sex.  and stupid relationships. teaches to make fun of the woman’s sexual body. uses sexual words i’ve never heard before in any movie. also a snake for the mans. im soooo angry that my 13 year old saw this.  the previews are to get all age groups interested. steve carell stooped so low. the words and scenes in this movie are not PG13. it’s an R.

cmurryoung says: Aug. 10, 2010

As I left the house to watch this movie with a friend, my 14 and 15 year olds asked me to see whether it was appropriate for their viewing.  I couldn’t help watching the movie from their perspective (especially given that there were a number of young teens in the front row).  This movie is inappropriate for kids and teens on many levels.  While comical in parts, the sexual innuendo is over the top.  Casual references to the female anatomy and sex are tacky and distasteful.  The shots of scantily clothed men and women made sex seem so casual.  I am also offended by the assumption made in so many films these days that men and women sleep together before marriage and that it is common and acceptable.  I am disappointed in Steve Carrell.  Be aware of the clips at the end of the film—the tackiest part of all.

Heinemann says: Aug. 11, 2012

I don’t know what you two are talking about there’s nothing wrong with this movie it’s not bad I think it’s 11 plus

You May Be Interested...

Also On The Web